Who is ultimately responsible for reviewing the findings of an investigation?

The command staff is ultimately responsible for reviewing the findings of an investigation because they are tasked with overseeing operations and ensuring accountability within the police department. The command staff typically consists of higher-ranking officers who have the authority to make decisions based on the investigation's results, assess the implications for department procedures, and determine any necessary actions or changes.

This review process is critical for maintaining the integrity of the department and ensuring that investigations are conducted thoroughly and fairly. The command staff's role includes coordinating with various units and ensuring that policies and standards are upheld. Their experience and leadership position enable them to interpret findings effectively and implement any recommendations resulting from the investigation, thereby fostering a culture of accountability and continuous improvement within the police force.

In contrast, while the Chief of Police has overall command, their role may focus more on strategic leadership rather than direct involvement in specific investigations. The officer involved may provide insights or testimony relevant to the investigation but is not in a position to review findings as an impartial party. The city council typically has a governance and oversight role, rather than direct involvement in the operational aspects of investigations.